Choosing the Red Pill
Every Senate Budget Committee Democrat Votes ‘No’ on Balancing the Budget | Guy Benson – the Conservative Top 10

Every Senate Budget Committee Democrat Votes ‘No’ on Balancing the Budget | Guy Benson

Imagine that! 

Their own plan doesn’t even come close to balancing, of course, and they’re not interested in other ideas to get there.  The first Republican amendment they torpedoed yesterday called for increasing federal spending at a clip of “only” 3.4 percent per year over the next decade, rather than the major acceleration that Democrats have advanced.  The second proposed making it more procedurally difficult to pass a budget that does not balance with ten years.  Watch as each Democrat-aligned committee member votes in lockstep against these provisions.  Make no mistake, they are explicitly rejecting a balanced federal budget (the roll call begins at the 1:15 mark):

If these Senators appear slightly perturbed in the clip, it might be because they’d just endured a contentious mark-up hearing.  Politico describes the acrimony:

During Thursday morning’s hearing, Republican members came out swinging, using time that was allocated to ask technical questions of the staff to make the case that the budget lacks any deficit reductions and instead grows the size of government. “I would really appreciate it if you would stop claiming $1.85 trillion in deficit reduction. It’s false. It’s false,” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said after a series of tense exchanges with a budget staffer. “It’s not false,” the staffer responded. “It’s false, I’m done,” Johnson shot back. The fight centered around how the budget is calculated and whether there should be assumptions made that the sequester will be replaced or spending for the war in Afghanistan will drop substantially. All told, Democrats made the case that the 10-year deficit reduction in the budget would be $1.85 trillion. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the ranking Republican, led the opposition, arguing the baseline, the assumption about the cost of government, was out of line.

“You can’t flip-flop baselines around here all over the place,” Sessions told the staff. When a staffer compared the Senate base to Ryan’s baseline, Sessions wasn’t pleased. “Mr. Ryan’s budget is honest and it’s paid for and this is not,” Sessions shot back. Sessions argued that the Democratic proposal would only reduce the deficit by $700 billion. “When the American people are hearing this, they’re hearing our colleagues announce with great pride that they’re reducing the deficit by $1.85 trillion,” Sessions said. “I’m deeply disappointed it does not do that. It makes no change in the debt course of America, leaving us on an unsustained path.” Sessions repeatedly called the budget proposal a “lie” and “false.” Murray, presiding over the meeting, tried frequently to cut off debate to allow for questions and eventually she seemed exhausted by the effort.

As a point of fact, Johnson and Sessions are correct on these counts.  The Hill and other news organizations have confirmed that Democrats’ budget numbers register at most $800 billion in deficit reductions over ten years, even setting aside its accelerated spending course.

Read the article

Of course, that’s not surprising when these same Democrats also vote to collude with the Mexican government to dole out free food for illegals:

Senate Democrats block effort to end USDA/Mexico food stamp promotion partnership | The Daily Caller

But, don’t worry.  Democrats do believe in a balanced budget.  Someday… Maybe…

Pelosi:’I Want Us to be on a Path to Balance the Budget in a Number of Decades’ | CNS News


Comments are closed.